but if you were to, and also were capable of comprehending, you would have seen that even a goofy web site like alternet understands statistical analysis better than you. Here's a tidbit from an article you linked but didn't read:
O'Reilly's statistics do not account for the disproportionate number of unarmed black Americans killed by police in the United States. As FiveThirtyEight notes:
In
2014 and March of 2015, Mapping Police Violence counted 297 people
killed by police around the country who were unarmed. Of those people,
117 were African-American, 167 were not, and the project couldn't
identify race for 13. That means 41 percent of unarmed people killed by
police during that time in the database (with an identified race) were
African-American, far out of proportion in a country that was 14 percent
African-American in 2013.
O'Reilly's statistics do not account for the disproportionate number of unarmed black Americans killed by police in the United States. As FiveThirtyEight notes:
In
2014 and March of 2015, Mapping Police Violence counted 297 people
killed by police around the country who were unarmed. Of those people,
117 were African-American, 167 were not, and the project couldn't
identify race for 13. That means 41 percent of unarmed people killed by
police during that time in the database (with an identified race) were
African-American, far out of proportion in a country that was 14 percent
African-American in 2013.
