I have my own opinions about the work he does for this program, and am in favor of him getting replaced by someone who has a much better understanding of the advancements in sports science over the last decade. But I want to foster a healthy debate and hear dissenting opinions. If you think Mick is doing well in his role here, could you lay out why you think that is? Or you can just vote. I want to see what the current sentiment among fans is.
